
RPA President's Letter March RPA President's LetterIn recent years we have seen overwhelming growth in the use
of Asphalt-Rubber binders for Open-graded and Gap-graded pavements
and also as a spray binder for Chipseals, Scrub Seals and Stress
Absorbing Membranes. The use of A-R Binders as SAMI's (Stress
Absorbing Membrane Interlayers) under new asphalt pavement was
one of material's original uses. When A-R chipseals have also become a performance enhancing part of the Capeseal system. Capeseal is the term coined in South Africa in the 1970s to define a combination chipseal and slurry seal or microsurfacing. They were used as primary all-weather road surfacings on top of prepared aggregate road bases. Emulsions were used for both chipseal binder and in the slurry/micros. South Africa's design criteria was to use a larger than normal chip aggregate and to use a very fine emulsion slurry seal to fill in around the stone gaps to form a locked matrix in which the large chip stone protruded through the slurry seal to provide excellent skid resistance. As practiced in the United States, Capeseals generally use a smaller chip stone and completely bind it with the slurry/micro final surfacing. Life expectancies with emulsion Capeseals are between 10 and 12 years on good pavements. However, with an Asphalt-Rubber binder in the chipseal, many surfacings are lasting 15 to 18 years or more with little or no crack reflection. The use of Asphalt-Rubber Capeseals also expands the range
of projects on which a Capeseal solution can be used. The City
of Phoenix has been using A-R Capeseals on both non-paved gravel
roads and alley-ways. They have been used within agencies where
chipseals had been previously banned due public fear of loose
aggregate because a Capeseal looks and performs similarly to
a new asphalt concrete surface. We are currently witnessing many proprietary polymer and polymer-rubber binders trying to enter the rubberized asphalt market. Most with little research, no proven life cycle costs, and dubious, unsubstantiated marketing claims that they are "just as good" as Asphalt-Rubber. The one thing they all seem to have in common is that they come with greater risk and cost in the long term to the user. Asphalt-Rubber, as supported and promoted by the Rubber Pavements Association, is an Open, Non-Proprietary System and as such can be made by any contractor or hot mix producer willing to invest in the equipment. There are also many contractor blenders who have specialized in providing Asphalt-Rubber blending on a project-by-project basis to the industry. If you have heard about Asphalt-Rubber but have never used it, the time is now.
(See Noise reports at
|
|||
|